Monday

What Makes Rubber Soul So Valuable a Contribution to Pop Music?

The emotions, sights, sounds, curious incidents and aspects of human nature that we experience are themes that have always transcended the changes in popularity for different musical genres since music came about. This is because, for humans, emotions and sensations are among the strongest driving-forces behind our actions in every aspect of our lives. This is why music is so deeply imbedded in nearly every culture on Earth—music is one form of art in which we can express ourselves and share our feelings with each other, spread messages of hope, love, sadness, and need for change. Musical artists that have the ability of a poet and the mastery of a fine musician can truly change the world, making their passion for song an invaluable contribution to their own cultures and beyond.

The Beatles, in their Album, Rubber Soul, demonstrate such mastery of musical and poetic precision in their harmonies, rhythms, and verses, that it is no wonder they are still considered some of the greatest musicians of all time fifty years later. In this album, the four sing of love, pain, friendship, change, hope and even hints at such psychedelic themes as love instead of hate and following dreams as a way to freedom. On the minds of many at the time, drugs and freedom to expression also can be interpreted into this loosely knit 14 track record.

Popularity arose for this particular album because it seems that there is at least one or two songs that can personally touch any listener as if the song were written for them. The content is personal, relatable and interpretable, but if nothing else, it is a well written, calm collection of songs, proving to the rock community that beautiful harmonies and real instruments can be just as effective as the strange, new, synthesized instruments! It is the unique ability of the Beatles to be original trail blazers for a new outgrowth of popular rock that makes it a valuable contribution to pop music even today.

Sunday

Blog #6



What is your “case” or chief example to explore in order to illustrate your argument?

My argument:
College rankings are not a true indicator of a college’s quality.  A school ranked higher on a ranking list is not necessarily a “better” school than a school ranked lower on a ranking list.
My “case”/chief example to explore in order to illustrate this:
The business of college rankings has become an example of consumerism.  If a school is more concerned about its reputation/how it’s viewed to the consumer, and ultimately, if the consumer will buy it, data will be altered in such a way that the odds are in their favor.  Even if the data used to calculate ranking is not untruthful, it may not be relevant as a deciding factor as to whether or not a college should be considered more valuable, or if it should be placed higher on a list.

Briefly summarized:
College rankings have been driven towards appealing to a consumer audience, where privatization also has a part.  College rankings may be untruthful in their data. However, it is still presented, as people base their decisions on what is presented to them, rather than question and search for other options as to how to judge and compare the quality of institutions.  People trust what is shown to them, so they buy it. Privatization also plays a role in this insufficient data.  Ultimately, college rankings are “selling” their quality or reputation to the consumer. The question is what it is ultimately that students want to “buy” from the college, which is its name or reputation, as they assume it is a determiner of the quality of education they’ll receive, and the respect it is given by future job hirers.   College rankings have to be viewed as business advertisements, rather than true facts, as colleges use these as a way to grab the consumer’s attention and display the best qualities of the university in a way that might cause the consumers to view other colleges as inferior to them. 

How does it speak to the debate you have identified in your proposal?

The debate I have identified in my proposal is that most people value college rankings, as they rely on them as true indicators as to whether or not colleges are of good quality.  However, it seems as though people are very ignorant as to what goes in to creating these rankings.  It can be assumed that people trust college rankings and do not consider them to be unreliable or examples of business advertising.  It speaks to this debate in that by students and parents relying on college rankings to the point where they are using them as a determining factor as to whether or not they should attend (or even apply), they are acting like consumers of a business choosing whether or not to buy a product.  

What research have you got on the case?

Through my research I have discovered how college rankings are made and how based on the process there is a great chance of unreliability.  First, people who work in admissions offices in higher institutions are the ones who submit the school’s data.  They can choose what to include or not include.  They can also even choose whom or whom not to include.  For example, they might choose to share only good statistics, so that what people are seeing are the very best of their data.  They might also choose to share only the data of students with a higher score on something, and not include data of students with lower scores, or in a particular program, etc. .  Second, they can also choose how to calculate certain aspects such as acceptance rates.  They might put a certain amount of students on a waiting list, so they can more accurately account for who was accepted, and who was not.  However, if students from a waiting list are accepted after a certain period of time, they might not choose to include them in the data, as this would make them appear less selective.  Third, they can spend a lot of money on advertising, or pay more than other schools to College Board, so they can reach out to more students, and in turn possibly have more students apply.  With a bigger application pool, they can make it look as though they accepted fewer students, and make themselves look more selective.  In reality though, they might not reveal how many students applied, or more importantly, how many spots were available in the first place (how many students they intended on having in a class).  Fourth, admissions directors of Ivy League schools are likely able to get away with the most, as Ivy League Schools are always regarded as being valuable, so they are not as carefully watched or questioned.  Fifth, there are some years that might have more applicants than another year based on the success of a sports team, or recognition of a professor, and this in turn might result in more applicants.  These determiners are of course not mentioned, but admissions directors are quick to use this in their statistical data.  If more people apply, there is a greater pool of students who are rejected, so the admission directors can say that there was an increase in selectivity, making it seem as though the college is becoming more competitive.  Fifth, schools can appear high on a list of a ranking regarding specific programs, when their program cannot be well compared to school’s programs, as they have different credentials.  Some programs at one school may not even exist at other schools. Sixth, data might be presented in an order that appeals to the consumer, but not in one that particularly makes sense, or is even relevant to the school. Seven, people who control college rankings do not and also most likely cannot prove statistics of colleges to be untrue.  There is no way for them to ultimately check on their data, and more importantly, there is no law that states one cannot submit false information to college rankings. 

What other details might be useful to know?

In sum, college rankings are reported to be data that is measured selectively.  The research presented above are seven examples in which admissions directors use students’ ignorance to their advantage and choose to also submit selective data.  Something also to keep in mind is that even college rankings that are 100% truthful (if there are such) might only include data of program offerings, not data of program outcomes, or only include data of student success on SATs, and not data of student outcome and performance. 

If there are online materials related to the case (including online articles, websites, or videos), please give those links in your post to help your readers and me learn more:

This article displays an example of how some colleges are misrepresenting exam scores, such as the SATs:
This article discusses how some view college rankings as unreliable.
This article explains that students should not use college rankings as a determining factor to where they will attend or even apply.
This article discusses how some colleges only include data of offerings, rather than include data of the outcomes.



Friday

How do we treat pop music as a vital, serious, and aesthetically-rich mode of cultural production? Is it art?

The Beatles showed that pop music can be art. Although Rubber Soul has a lot of simple love songs, this album also introduces songs with deeper meaning that people analyze in many different ways, such as “Norwegian Wood”. For the first time, The Beatles showed that they were experimenting with ideas, just in time for the 1960’s ways of change and rebellion. More importantly, they were also using new instruments, such as the Indian sitar to give pop music a new and distinct sound.

Did Rubber Soul change history and culture? In what ways did history and culture shape Rubber Soul?

Before the Beatles, music was commonly appreciated by its album, not individual songs. Singles were very popular and albums were not currently regarded to have specific themes and meanings that tie up each song into one general idea. Although the Beatles had a number of singles that were hits, for the time in Rubber Soul, The Beatles displayed a work that conveyed a message as a whole, rather than through individual songs. Something interesting on the cover of the album is the way the letters are displayed. They appear to be bulging out of their boundaries. Could the artwork reflect how the Beatles were feeling in this time? Did they want to reach out and make change? Also, each band member’s eyes are focused in a different direction on the front cover. This could possibly imply many different ideas or angles to understand something. I think at this point, the Beatles were looking to experiment and be open to new, creative ideas. I think the 60’s culture truly influenced the album.

During this time, teenagers and young adults were being encouraged to rebel and experiment, something that The Beatles show they value. Bob Dylan also largely shaped Rubber Soul, as he was a substantial influence to the band. Interestingly, Bob Dylan is said to be the one who introduced the band to marijuana, which perhaps also helped shape the album’s use of new experimentation and creativity. Rubber Soul was the beginning of a substantial transition away from pop music with little meaning, to music with more creativity and soul. Rubber Soul definitely changed the music industry during the 60’s, and in turn, the time period that was so focused on change and experimentation truly shaped Rubber Soul.

Thursday

An Interview beween The Beatles and Playboy

Playboy: "There's been some dispute among your fans and critics, about whether you're primarily entertainers or musicians... or perhaps neither. What's your own opinion?"

John: "We're money-makers first; then we're entertainers."

Ringo: "No, we're not."

John: "What are we, then?"

Ringo: "Dunno. Entertainers first."

John: "OK."

Ringo: "'Cuz we were entertainers before we were money-makers."

John: "That's right, of course. It's just that the press drivels it into you, so you say it 'cuz they like to hear it, you know."

Paul: "Still, we'd be idiots to say that it isn't a constant inspiration to be making alot of money. It always is, to anyone. I mean, why do big business tycoons stay big business tycoons? It's not because they're inspired at the greatness of big business; they're in it because they're making alot of money at it. We'd be idiots if we pretended we were in it solely for kicks. In the beginning we were, but at the same time we were hoping to make a bit of cash. it's a switch around now, though, from what it used to be. We used to be doing it mainly for kicks and not making alot of money, and now we're making alot of money without too many kicks... except that we happen to like the money we're making. But we still enjoy making records, going on-stage, making films, and all that business."

John: "We love every minute of it, Beatle people!"

http://www.dmbeatles.com/interviews.php?interview=33

Paul On the Production of "Nowhere Man"

"That was John after a night out, with dawn coming up. I think at that point in his life, he was a bit wondering where he was going."

Lennon, 1980

"Norwegian Wood' is my song completely. It was about an affair I was having. I was very careful and paranoid because I didn't want my wife, Cyn, to know that there really was something going on outside of the household. I'd always had some kind of affairs going on, so I was trying to be sophisticated in writing about an affair... but in such a smoke-screen way that you couldn't tell. But I can't remember any specific woman it had to do with."

"Rubber Soul" Brought new Meaning to Producing an Album

For more than fifty years, the goal of a band was to release as many singles as possible as quickly as possible. Producing an album simply meant compiling a selection of completely unrelated singles. Little sense of weaving together musical and literary themes, political and cultural themes throughout one album was fostered by the popular bands until "Rubber Soul" came along. This idea brought a whole new level of quality to pop music, once again blurring the line for what was expected of music.
The songs in Rubber Soul go from the normal, shallow songs describing an event, as with "Drive My Car", to songs dealing with much more unfamiliar topics with deeper themes, such as existentialism. In "Nowhere Man", for instance, the Beatles move from common "love" and "loss" type of songs to a deep seeded message of how to find meaning in life, something everyone struggles with, along with love and loss, but something which few really expressed in pop music before.
As you listen to the album through, it is easy to pick out the places where it veers off from mainstream pop music (Paul McCartney's interest in avant garde must have played a big role here). Again, songs like "In My Life" offer personal insight into the power of memories, and the power of love to make one forget, a unique choice of topic which ties in well with the "Nowhere Man" and finding meaning in life. For, when a person looks at their past, and looks back on their memories, they have a sort of power to realize meaning into what good or misfortunate things may have happened, giving them a greater sense of meaning in their life.
Each song in "Rubber" soul can be connected in some where, even if just by musical style, chords and notes, to another in the album, helping the listener to build a certain congruency with the album as a whole, that is not possible with the singles albums previously produced.
Because weaving songs together to form one work of art drove deeper meaning into each song individually, forming albums like this became more and more popular, changing expectations for singles to expectation for a congruent album for a short time.

The Songwriter as the New Poet

Songwriting has come, over time, to virtually replace poetry. While poetry lives in small, less well known communities, music reaches every ear in this culture of "virtual connection." Everyone knows when the next album of so-and-so artist will come out, and the hit song is the buzz of the week. It is common to hear your friend reference a song in conversation. Back in the day, when songwriting was less common, and poetry celebrities were actual poets, the lines of the most popular ones were at the tip of the tongue for every educated individual.
In a way, vocal music today has become the universal poetry. Many songs employ similar rhythms and rhymes as traditional poems, and include insights, and deep meanings. Today, with the lack of interest in traditional poets, those with the talent to produce poetry reroute their energy to songwriting, because it gains more appreciation with today's culture.
It is interesting how a song like one the Beatles wrote can have a similar effect on person as a poem that T.S. Eliot wrote would have had on the people then.

"Norwegian Wood" Song Facts and Interpretation

“Norwegian Wood"
John Lennon: Vocals, acoustic guitar
Paul McCartney: Bass guitar, vocals
George Harrison: Sitar, acoustic guitar
Ringo Starr: Tambourine, maracas, finger cymbals

“Norwegian Wood” was written by mostly John Lennon in February of 1965 and recorded on October 21, 1965. Lennon has remarked that this song was about an affair he had with a journalist. He later admitted to several affairs with women during his marriage with his wife, Cynthia. McCartney contributed to writing the bridges. He has added that the song received its title by the inspiration of the bedroom of a record producer and artist named Pete Asher that was made of Norwegian pinewood, a construction that was popular then.

The instruments in “Norwegian Wood” are fascinating, as the Beatles introduce the Indian sitar, noting to be the first time that that a sitar was used in a Western pop album. The use of the sitar and of John and Paul’s soft, relaxed voices give the listener a very tranquil feeling. The lyrics are also very captivating especially at the end when Lennon sings, “And when I awoke I was alone. This bird had flown, so I lit a fire. Isn't it good Norwegian wood?” These lyrics leave the listener wondering if the bird is the woman with whom Lennon was having an affair, and why he may have lit a fire. Is the fire he sings about literally fire? These lyrics are story-like, as the singer talks the listener through them like as though they are flash backs in his memories.

“Norwegian Wood”

I once had a girl
Or should I say she once had me
She showed me her room
Isn't it good Norwegian wood?

She asked me to stay
And she told me to sit anywhere
So I looked around
And I noticed there wasn't a chair

I sat on a rug biding my time
drinking her wine
We talked until two and then she said
"it's time for bed"

She told me she worked
in the morning and started to laugh
I told her I didn't
and crawled off to sleep in the bath

And when I awoke I was alone
This bird had flown
So I lit a fire
Isn't it good Norwegian wood?

Studying The Sixties

The best way to understand the sixties is to study the art forms that were a product of the sixties. Music, drawing, painting, photography, whatever it may be, are ways for any person to express themselves, find a voice or deliver a message. Each artist put a little (or big!) part of themselves into their work, making it personal, letting their audience into their experience of the world as they saw it and leaving a legacy behind them for future generations to do the same. By studying an artist's legacy, we can gain insight into how they saw the world, giving us a valuable tool into studying the big picture of the Sixties.

"You Won't See Me" Facts and Interpretation

“You Won't See Me”

Paul McCartney: Vocal, bass guitar, piano
John Lennon: Vocals
George Harrison: Guitar, vocals
Ringo Starr: Drums, tambourine, hi-hat

“You Won't See Me” was recorded on November 11, 1965 in two takes during a marathon recording session that lasted 13 hours during the Beatles’ last day to record before the final mixing. This catchy tune has a real pop feel. “You Won't See Me” is thought to be about Paul’s relationship with Jane Asher. This song shows a more serious side through its lyrics. Paul seems to be singing about deprivation. He wants attention from someone (most likely his girlfriend) who does not seem to notice him. He expresses sorrow and grief when he sings, “Though the days are few, they're filled with tears and since I lost you It feels like years.”

Paul seems to had gone into a state of depression during a time when his girlfriend either did not pay attention to him or left him unexpextadly. Paul was heartbroken. I found this song particularly interesting because although the lyrics are very sad, the instrumentals help the song catch the listener with the repetition of the vocals in “Ooh la la la” and the melodic pattern.

“You Won't See Me”

When I call you up
Your line's engaged
I have had enough
So act your age
We have lost the time
that was so hard to find
And I will lose my mind
If you won't see me
you won't see me

I don't know why
you should want to hide
But I can't get through
My hands are tied
I won't want to stay
I don't gave much to say
But I can't turn away
And you won't see me
you won't see me

Time after time
You refuse to even listen
I wouldn't mind
If I knew what I was missing

Though the days are few
They're filled with tears
And since I lost you
It feels like years
Yes, it seems so long
Girl, since you've been gone
And I just can't go on
If you won't see me
you won't see me

Time after time
You refuse to even listen
I wouldn't mind
If I knew what I was missing

Though the days are few
They're filled with tears
And since I lost you
It feels like years
Yes, it seems so long
Girl, since you've been gone
And I just can't go on
If you won't see me
you won't see me

"What Goes On" Song Facts and Analyzation

“What Goes On”
Ringo Starr: Vocals, drums
John Lennon: Electric guitar, vocals
Paul McCartney: Bass guitar, vocals
George Harrison: Electric guitar

“What Goes On” was recorded on November 4, 1965. This song is sung by Ringo. However, when asked about Ringo’s contribution to the song writing he said, “About five words.” “What Goes On” was interestingly supposed to be recorded on March 5, 1963, but the band ran out of time and the song was forgotten about. “What Goes On” is a distinctive song as this introduces The Beatles playing in the country and western genre. In addition to Rubber Soul, “What Goes On” was also put on the B-side on the single Nowhere Man, released in February 1966.

I found this song to be very unique. The listener can instantly sense a country feel and a new voice, as Paul and John are more often the lead singers. The lyrics portray an anxious and curious mind. “What goes on in your heart? What goes on in your mind?” It seems as though a girl has hurt Paul or John by leaving a relationship with them to be with another man. I would think that Paul, John, and George found a general overlapping through their feelings and thoughts that wondered why women behave the way they do. This song is about heartbreak and betrayal and dishonesty. “What Goes On” is the question asked of the woman of her disloyalty and deceit towards the man.

“What Goes On”
What goes on in your heart?
What goes on in your mind?
You are tearing me apart
When you treat me so unkind
What goes on in your mind

The other day I saw you
As I walked along the road
But when I saw him with you
I could feel my future fold
It's so easy for a girl like you to lie
Tell me why

What goes on in your heart?
What goes on in your mind?
You are tearing me apart
When you treat me so unkind
What goes on in your mind

I met you in the morning
waiting for the tides of time
But now the tide is turning
I can see that I was blind
It's so easy for a girl like you to lie
Tell me why
What goes on in your heart?

I used to think of no one else
But you were just the same
You didn't even think of me
As someone with a name
Did you mean to break my heart and watch me die
Tell me why

What goes on in your heart?
What goes on in your mind?
You are tearing me apart
When you treat me so unkind
What goes on in your mind

Individualistic Materialism, Radicalism, Pacifism and other Cultural Quandaries



Beatles music can be studied at so many different levels and is truly like studying literature, or poetry! It is incredible how four, very different men collaborated their various interests, political and social views, and personalities to create historically significant music. According Ian MacDonald, a well known British music critic, each of the Beatles brought to their music different understandings of what message the music would give, making it multi-faceted and often self-contradictory!

MacDonald brings to the reader's attention the particular influences each individual Beatles member gave to their music. The sixties, more than anything else, was a time of transition and as a result, a time of personal and cultural turmoil. Individualistic materialism began to replace traditional Religious belief systems, as technology brought previously "upper-class-only" items to the middle classes, releasing a wave for the need for instant gratification. People began to replace their religious ideas of enduring suffering on earth for a eternal happiness in Heaven, or whatever afterlife they believed in, with a sense that they could enjoy gratification and pleasures immediately, whenever they wanted. However, religious themes crept quickly through the back door, as the hippies began to promote spiritual growth with the help of drugs. All in one culture, an given person would be influenced by the pervading sense of materialism, the pressure to use drugs, and desire to make a change in the world by joining a protest, violent or passive. As can be imagined, the cultural quandary that people found themselves in with so many contradictory philosophies to choose from, became a huge theme expressed through the arts, and especially by the Beatles in Rubber Soul.

George Harrison's clearest individual contribution to the Beatles music was through his rhythm and guitar and sitar playing. Strongly influence by the deeply religious and meditative Indian culture, Harrison was really the only Beatle who brought a religious element to their music. Two songs that can be analyzed as "particularly Harrison's" are "Think for Yourself" and "If I needed Someone".

In "If I needed Someone", Harrison writes:
If I needed someone to love
You're the one that I'd be thinking of
If I needed someone

If I had some more time to spend
Then I guess I'd be with you my friend
If I needed someone
Had you come some other day
Then it might not have been like this
But you see now I'm too much in love

Carve your number on my wall
And maybe you will get a call from me
If I needed someone
Ah, ah, ah, ah

If I had some more time to spend
Then I guess I'd be with you my friend
If I needed someone
Had you come some other day
Then it might not have been like this
But you see now I'm too much in love

Carve your number on my wall
And maybe you will get a call from me
If I needed someone
Ah, ah
Rather than jumping into an impulsive relationship based on a shallow desire, as much of sixties culture would promote, Harrison introduces a more prudent search for love, the way he would do it. Harrison essentially is saying that he is not quite ready for a relationship, but he recognizes that there is a woman who does love him. If he needs someone, he reasons, if she leaves her phone number carved somewhere he can find it, he will give her a call. Even though a little sad, this song is really hopeful, as Harrison is making a bit of a promise that, if she is willing to wait, when he feels ready to fall in love, he will.

The whole aspect of waiting for the right time to fall in love goes against the more psychedelic culture of living free, something which both Lennon and McCartney were more accustomed to. According to MacDonald, Lennon can be most strongly associated with the psychedelic culture and pacifism, which really shows through in their song "The Word".
Say the word and you'll be free
Say the word and be like me
Say the word I'm thinking of
Have you heard the word is love?
It's so fine, It's sunshine
It's the word, love
In the beginning I misunderstood
But now I've got it, the word is good

Spread the word and you'll be free
Spread the word and be like me
Spread the word I'm thinking of
Have you heard the word is love?
It's so fine, It's sunshine
It's the word, love
Everywhere I go I hear it said
In the good and the bad books that I have read

Say the word and you'll be free
Say the word and be like me
Say the word I'm thinking of
Have you heard the word is love?
It's so fine, It's sunshine
It's the word, love
Now that I know what I feel must be right
I'm here to show everybody the light

Give the word a chance to say
That the word is just the way
It's the word I'm thinking of
And the only word is love
It's so fine, It's sunshine
It's the word, love
Here the classic hippie mantra of revolution through love is clearly stated. Freedom to be individual and throw off the alienation that American culture set, can be gained by spreading love! Interestingly, Lennon and McCartney, who wrote this song, are almost putting themselves in the position of a prophet, someone who has seen the light, and has come back to direct others toward it.
Now that I know what I feel must be right
I'm here to show everybody the light
The song that speaks most directly to the common hippie theme of breaking away from conformity is one written again by Lennon and McCartney, "Nowhere Man".
He's a real nowhere man,
Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.

Doesn't have a point of view,
Knows not where he's going to,
Isn't he a bit like you and me?

Nowhere Man please listen,
You don't know what you're missing,
Nowhere Man,the world is at your command!

(lead guitar)

He's as blind as he can be,
Just sees what he wants to see,
Nowhere Man can you see me at all?

Nowhere Man, don't worry,
Take your time, don't hurry,
Leave it all till somebody else
lends you a hand!

Doesn't have a point of view,
Knows not where he's going to,
Isn't he a bit like you and me?

Nowhere Man please listen,
you don't know what you're missing
Nowhere Man, the world is at your command!

He's a real Nowhere Man,
Sitting in his Nowhere Land,
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody.
Making all his nowhere plans
for nobody!
Here a man is depicted having little influence and being influenced by little or nothing at all. In this time of change, Lennon and McCartney call for an "up-and-at-'em" attitude, and try to tell the conforming type how much they are missing, and how much they could get out of life if they broke away from conformity. This is certainly one of the most widespread and best understood hippie view in the fifties and sixties.

By presenting so many viewpoints in their music, the Beatles show that they accept all different types of people, all different types of problems, and especially, all different viewpoints. As I listened to each song over and over again, enjoying each more each time around, I realized that none of the songs have a negative tone. While some are sad, there is always a hopeful line. I think this is the Beatles' way of conveying to their audience the tremendous hope of good things that would come from the turbulent and confusing aspects sixties. Essentially, they point out many different perspectives and say "Hey, you can have that view, just as long as you make something out of it, and don't just sit their conforming!" I think this is part of the reason the Beatles were so popular. At the deepest level, they were accepting, and hopeful, two attributes everyone is attracted to.

Wednesday

"Norwegian Wood" Interpreted



Traditionally a Classical Hindustani Musical instrument going as far back as the Middle Ages, the sitar appears in a few of the Beatle's songs, but in only one song in "Rubber soul". George Harrison, who would later become deeply involved with Indian culture and who would become a practitioner of "transcendental meditation", says in retrospect to recording "Norwegian Wood":

"When we were working on Norwegian Wood it just needed something, and it was quite spontaneous, from what I remember. I just picked up my sitar, found the notes and just played it. We miked it up and put it on and it just seemed to hit the spot."

Norwegian wood is a type of cheap pine, which became quite popular in the 60's. McCartney explains the analogy between the attributes of Norwegian wood and the shallow character of a lot of the women that the Beatles knew.

"It was pine really, cheap pine. But it's not as good a title, "Cheap Pine", baby. So it was a little parody really on those kind of girls who when you'd go to their flat there would be a lot of Norwegian wood."

For McCartney, the metaphor stopped there, but for Lennon, the song generally represented the many affairs he had with "cheap women". McCartney explains what the song meant to Lennon:

"So she makes him sleep in the bath and then finally in the last verse I had this idea to set the Norwegian wood on fire as revenge, so we did it very tongue in cheek. She led him on, then said, "You'd better sleep in the bath." In our world the guy had to have some sort of revenge ... so it meant I burned the place down."
Burning a house down out of revenge reminds me vividly of "Jane Eyre" and "Wide Sargasso Sea". I think the stories can be compared. In the song, "Norwegian Wood", the woman belittles the man by leading him on and then making him sleep in the bath tub. The man, who feels taken-advantage-of, seeks revenge in the most destructive way he can think of, burning the woman's home down.

In Wide Sargasso Sea, (obviously the emotions are more intense and the reasons for revenge more founded) Rochester essentially cages Antoinette up like an animal in the attic, only attending to her most basic needs, and for that, he hires a servant. In Jane Erye, what the reader doesn't know until later, is that the ghostlike crazy woman in the attic is indeed Rochester's wife! I do not blame Antoinette Cosway for burning down the house, as it truly was her only escape to freedom, even though she perished in the flames.

Even as I examine the lyrics more closely, I can read deeper meaning into them as they relate to Antoinette Cosway's predicament.

She asked me to stay and she told me to sit anywhere,
So I looked around and I noticed there wasn't a chair.
Isn't it true that Rochester asked Antoinette to come back to England with him from the Caribbean, promising her the life of a spouse? But when Antoinette got to England, she found no chair there for her--Rochester had already abandoned her in spirit--left her to sleep in the bathtub.

Rochester is just like Lennon's "Cheap Women". He fell in love impulsively not for genuine sentiments, but because of Antoinette's beauty in appearance. Just like Lennon must have found out during his affairs, such impulsive behavior leads you to something dark in the end--In rochester's case, a demon he was wed to for life.



Monday

"Nowhere Man"

"I thought of myself sitting there, doing nothing and getting nowhere."
~John Lennon

Friday

Songs to analyze

"You Won’t See Me"-Arianna

"Nowhere Man"—Mary

"What Goes On"—Arianna

"I’m Looking Through You"—Mary

"Norwegian Wood"- Arianna

Song Lyrics to all of "Rubber Soul"

http://www.bjornetjenesten.dk/teksterdk/beatles/RubberSoul.html

Questions we asked in our interviews

1 What was it like for you growing up when the Beatles were popular?

2 Why do you like the album, Rubber Soul?

3 What do consider the best song in this album to be? Which is most meaningful to you, which is your favourite?

4 How did the songs in this album influence you when they were first released, and do they still hold some meaning to you now?

5 What makes the Beatles and their album Rubber Soul stand out to you?

6 Do you think the Beatles Changed the 60’s and/or the music industry?

7 Who was your favourite band member?

8. George Martic described this album as “the first album to present a new, growing Beatles to the world. For the first time we began to think of albums as art of their own, as complete entities.” Do you agree with him? Do you see this in any of the songs from this album?

9 Is there a song that surprised or confused you in this album?

10 What changes do you notice between Rubber soul and previous albums, such as “Help” regarding style, function, message?